Epic war-time survival story “The Weapons of Muschu” has already assembled a weighty solid forward of a manufacturing begin within the first quarter of 2025.

The movie is an adaptation of the non-fiction ebook “The Weapons of Muschu,” written by Don Dennis, with an tailored screenplay by Tom Broadhurst and Jack Brislee (“Hazard Shut: The Battle of Lengthy Tan”). The narrative brings to life a pivotal chapter of Australian battle historical past with gritty authenticity, recounting the excessive physique depend Operation Copper, a mission throughout WWII when Australian and New Zealand troops had been despatched into the jungles of Papua New Guinea.

The target of the mission was to research the Japanese defenses on Muschu Island, seize a Japanese officer for interrogation and uncover the situation of two naval weapons on the island that had been defending a harbor. Eight commandos had been landed as a part of the operation, however just one survived.

The story in “The Weapons of Muschu” focuses on the mission’s lone survivor, Mick Dennis, whose harrowing journey is one among not possible odds and endurance by means of unimaginable brutality.

To be directed by Matthew Holmes (“The Legend of Ben Corridor,” “The Price”), the manufacturing has solid Ben Corridor (“Warnie,” “Satan’s Playground,” “Higher Man”) within the lead position as Dennis. The movie has additionally already connected Australian actors Matt Day (“Candy Nation”), Callan McAuliffe (“The Strolling Lifeless”), Jordan Fraser-Trumble (“The Legend of Ben Corridor”), Gerald Lepkowski (“The Loss of life of Stalin”), Maximillian Johnson (“Excessive Floor”), Clayton Watson (“The Matrix Reloaded”), Damon Hunter (“The Price”) and Arthur Angel (“Crimson Canine”).

Manufacturing is by Rally Level Media, RLC Movement Image Leisure and Two Tone Footage, a repeat of the collaboration that led to 2017’s “The Legend of Ben Corridor” and thriller “The Price” final 12 months.

Supply of the finished image is focused for the primary quarter of 2026, in time for an Australian theatrical distributor to achieve cinema screens by Anzac Day [April 25] in 2026. No native distributor or worldwide gross sales consultant has but been connected.

“’The Weapons of Muschu’ pays tribute to the extraordinary bravery of the Anzacs,” stated Holmes. “The story of Mick Dennis and the boys of Operation Copper is a testomony to the indomitable spirit of Australian troopers who served within the Pacific Theater throughout World Battle II. It additionally makes for astonishing cinema that may stun audiences worldwide.”

The U.S. Senate voted Tuesday to approve a invoice that might ban TikTok nationwide until Chinese language guardian firm ByteDance sells its stake within the fashionable app. The event will doubtless lead to a courtroom battle between the U.S. and TikTok, which argues that the laws violates the First Modification.

The invoice now strikes to the desk of President Biden, a supporter of the TikTok divest-or-ban measure who has stated he’ll signal it into legislation. U.S. lawmakers have expressed deep concern about TikTok’s Chinese language possession, suggesting that the Chinese language communist regime may use the app to spy on Individuals or use it to promulgate pro-China propaganda.

The Senate approval of the TikTok ban invoice was tied to a $95 billion package deal of international support to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan. The Senate, by a 79-18 vote, OK’d the bundled laws after the Home handed the resolutions Saturday and despatched them on an expedited foundation to the Senate for approval on an up-or-down vote.

TikTok will file a authorized problem as soon as the invoice is signed into legislation, Michael Beckerman, TikTok’s head of public coverage for the Americas, wrote in a memo to firm employees over the weekend. The laws is a “clear violation” of the First Modification, the exec wrote: “That is the start, not the top of this lengthy course of.” Beckerman additionally criticized the TikTok divest-or-ban measure as “an unprecedented deal labored out between the Republican Speaker [Mike Johnson] and President Biden.”

Forward of the vote, Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, delivered feedback on the Senate flooring Tuesday afternoon in regards to the nationwide safety threats posed by ByteDance’s possession of TikTok. Passage of the invoice “goes a great distance in the direction of safeguarding our democratic programs from covert international affect,” he stated, saying that Chinese language corporations like ByteDance “don’t owe their obligation to their clients, or their shareholders, however they owe it to the PRC [People’s Republic of China] authorities.”

“This isn’t an effort to take your voice away…  I’d emphasize this isn’t a ban of the service you admire,” Warner stated, addressing TikTok customers. Common Individuals aren’t aware of labeled briefings members of Congress have obtained about TikTok from intelligence companies and the dangers it poses as an entity “working on the route of a international adversary,” Warner stated. “We hope that TikTok will proceed beneath new possession — American or in any other case. It may very well be purchased by a bunch from Britain, Canada, Brazil, France. It simply must now not be managed by an adversary that’s outlined as an adversary in U.S. legislation.”

Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), chair of the Senate’s Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, urged TikTok and ByteDance are “weaponizing” knowledge and AI to spy on Americans, the army and authorities personnel, together with journalists overlaying the corporate. (In 2022, ByteDance stated it fired 4 workers for “misconduct” after the corporate discovered they accessed TikTok knowledge on a number of customers, together with two reporters.)

Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) spoke out in opposition to the TikTok ban invoice earlier than the ultimate vote, saying the extra urgent “clear and current hazard” is the hurt youngsters face from social media apps extra broadly, together with from U.S.-based corporations.

“I don’t deny that TikTok poses some nationwide safety dangers,” Markey stated. “TikTok has its issues. No. 1, TikTok poses a critical threat to the privateness and psychological well being of our younger folks.” However he stated the invoice doubtless would lead to “widespread censorship,” and he urged that the invoice’s supporters object to liberal political viewpoints fashionable on TikTok. “As a substitute of suppressing speech on a single software, we may very well be addressing the basis of the psychological well being disaster by focusing on Large Tech’s pernicious, privacy-invasion enterprise mannequin of youngsters and youngsters in our nation,” Markey stated.

TikTok has stated the invoice, if it turns into legislation, would infringe the free-speech rights of its 170 million U.S. customers and “devastate” the estimated 7 million American companies on the platform. It claims TikTok contributes $24 billion to the U.S. economic system yearly.

The TikTok divest-or-ban laws has been opposed by the ACLU and different advocacy teams.

“That is nonetheless nothing greater than an unconstitutional ban in disguise,” Jenna Leventoff, senior coverage counsel on the ACLU, stated in a press release Tuesday previous to the Senate vote. “Banning a social media platform that tons of of tens of millions of Individuals use to specific themselves would have devastating penalties for all of our First Modification rights, and can nearly actually be struck down in courtroom.”

Due to its Chinese language ties, TikTok has been a political soccer in the US for years, in addition to in different nations (together with India, the place it’s been banned since June 2020). TikTok has prevailed in difficult different legal guidelines within the U.S. searching for to ban the app. Final December, a federal choose blocked Montana’s first-of-its-kind statewide ban of TikTok, ruling that the legislation doubtless violated the First Modification. An try by the Trump administration to drive ByteDance to promote TikTok or face a ban additionally was discovered unconstitutional by federal courts on First Modification grounds.

Underneath the “Defending Individuals From International Adversary Managed Purposes Act” invoice, Apple and Google’s app shops and webhosting companies within the U.S. could be barred from internet hosting any “international adversary managed software.” Particularly, it will prohibit distribution of TikTok until ByteDance divests its possession within the app inside 9 months of turning into legislation, with an extra 90-day extension potential on the president’s discretion if “a path to executing a professional divestiture has been recognized.” Johnson, the Home speaker, integrated the TikTok ban (revised with the prolonged divestiture timeline) into the emergency supplemental appropriations invoice in a bid to win Republican help for the package deal of international support.

Backers of the TikTok invoice argue that it doesn’t prohibit free speech, saying it merely requires apps to be owned by an organization that isn’t topic to the management of an adversarial international authorities. As a precedent, the laws’s proponents level to the 2020 sale of relationship app Grindr by Chinese language gaming firm Beijing Kunlun Tech Co. to a bunch of U.S.-based buyers, a transaction pressured by the U.S. authorities over issues in regards to the privateness of the app’s customers.

Per the textual content of the invoice, authorized challenges to the “Defending Individuals From International Adversary Managed Purposes Act” could also be filed solely within the U.S. Court docket of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

If TikTok is unsuccessful in getting the divest-or-ban legislation overturned, it’s unlikely that ByteDance would promote its possession stake — and that the app would successfully develop into outlawed within the U.S. Chinese language officers have stated the federal government would “firmly oppose” any pressured sale of TikTok, which might symbolize a know-how export and be topic to the federal government’s approval. “You’re not going to have the ability to drive ByteDance to divest,” James Lewis, SVP on the Heart for Strategic and Worldwide Research, informed the New York Occasions final month.

Megan Thee Stallion‘s former photograph and videographer alleges he was compelled to witness her having intercourse with a lady in a lawsuit filed Tuesday in Los Angeles. Plaintiff Emilio Garcia can also be accusing the Texas-born entertainer of harassment and a hostile work setting.

Garcia names Roc Nation (who manages Megan) and Megan’s touring and entrainment corporations as defendants within the 42-page go well with that alleges wage and hour violations. He claims Megan “berated and directed fat-shaming feedback” in the direction of him, citing direct quotes equivalent to “Fats Bitch,” “Spit your meals out,” and “You don’t should be consuming.”

Within the lawsuit, Garcia particulars an obscene incident that was stated to have occurred in Ibiza throughout June 2022: After an evening out, Garcia recollects being with Megan and three different ladies in an SUV when Megan started to have intercourse subsequent to him. He says Megan informed him to by no means “focus on what you noticed,” and that after they returned from the journey, his compensation construction was modified from “a month-to-month flat-rate to a pay-per-task” association. The lawsuit alleges that Garcia was not allowed to work for anybody else and was denied extra time pay and breaks whereas he was working with Megan.

“Stallion’s misclassification of his employment standing left him with out fundamental insurance coverage protection, depriving him of important well being care,” the lawsuit states. “[Garcia] grapples with mounting anxiousness, despair, and bodily misery stemming from the poisonous work setting, compounded by
the trauma of unpaid work.”

An lawyer for Megan Thee Stallion, Alex Spiro, stated Tuesday: “That is an employment declare for cash — with no sexual harassment declare filed and with salacious accusations to try to embarrass her. We are going to cope with this in courtroom.”

Garcia is being represented by Ron Zambrano, the lawyer representing quite a few dancers accusing Lizzo of sexual harassment and a hostile work setting. In that go well with, three of Lizzo’s former dancers say they have been pressured — on account of worry of dropping their jobs — to the touch nude dancers throughout a dwell intercourse present in Amsterdam’s Crimson Gentle District. In addition they accuse Lizzo of racial harassment, incapacity discrimination, assault and false imprisonment.

A consultant for Zambrano didn’t instantly return Selection‘s request for remark however in an announcement to NBC, who first broke the story, stated: “Megan simply must pay our shopper what he’s due, come clean with her conduct and give up this kind of sexual harassment and fats shaming conduct.”

The Federal Commerce Fee on Tuesday issued a remaining rule banning noncompete clauses in employment contracts within the U.S. However specialists within the discipline stated the FTC‘s transfer will certainly be challenged in court docket.

Underneath the FTC’s new rule, if it goes into impact, current noncompete agreements for the “overwhelming majority” of staff will not be enforceable. Present noncompetes for workers deemed to be senior executives — who signify lower than 0.75% of staff, in accordance with the company — can stay in power beneath the FTC’s remaining rule, however employers can be prohibited from getting into into or making an attempt to implement any new noncompetes, even when they contain senior executives. Employers can be required to supply discover to staff apart from senior executives who’re sure by an current noncompete that they won’t be imposing any noncompetes in opposition to them.

Textual content of the brand new FTC rule is out there at this hyperlink.

“Noncompete clauses maintain wages low, suppress new concepts and rob the American economic system of dynamism, together with from the greater than 8,500 new startups that may be created a 12 months as soon as noncompetes are banned,” FTC chair Lina Khan (pictured above) stated in an announcement. “The FTC’s remaining rule to ban noncompetes will guarantee Individuals have the liberty to pursue a brand new job, begin a brand new enterprise or carry a brand new concept to market.”

The FTC estimates that some 30 million U.S. staff, almost one in 5 Individuals, are topic to a noncompete. The company’s vote to approve the issuance of the ultimate rule was 3-2. The three Democratic commissioners (Khan, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya) voted sure; the 2 Republican commissioners (Melissa Holyoak and Andrew Ferguson) voted no.

Employment specialists stated the FTC rule banning noncompetes can be challenged.

“Everyone can take a breath, because the FTC vote might not impression enterprise in the present day and even tomorrow, as a result of we anticipate authorized challenges that delay implementation,” stated Heather Weine Brochin, chair of the employment and labor follow at legislation agency Day Pitney. “From a sensible perspective, this isn’t the ultimate say — employers don’t must shred their noncompetes. We might nonetheless be speaking about this, and proceed to stay unsure about the way forward for noncompetes, in a month and even after the presidential election.”

Keith Wilkes, a companion at legislation agency Corridor Estill and a labor and employment authorized knowledgeable, additionally anticipates a authorized problem to the FTC resolution. “No matter this partisan administrative resolution, we suspect {that a} lawsuit can be rapidly filed in federal court docket — in almost certainly a conservative jurisdiction — looking for a direct keep of the implementation of the noncompete ban till the federal courts weigh in and in the end determine its destiny,” Wilkes stated.

TechFreedom — which describes itself as a nonprofit, nonpartisan expertise coverage assume tank — has asserted that the FTC lacks the authority to situation a ban on noncompete settlement (or every other main guidelines governing unfair strategies of competitors). “Nobody can significantly anticipate this Supreme Court docket to uphold the FTCʼs interpretation” of its skill to institute a ban of noncompetes beneath the FTC Act, in accordance with TechFreedom president Berin Szóka. The fee’s studying of the statute “assumes that Congress delegated huge lawmaking powers to the FTC with out clear limiting ideas.”

Within the remaining rule, the FTC decided that noncompete clauses are an unfair methodology of competitors and subsequently a violation of Part 5 of the FTC Act. The fee stated employers have a number of options to noncompetes that also “allow companies to guard their investments with out having to implement a noncompete.” The FTC cited commerce secret legal guidelines and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) as each offering employers with “well-established means to guard proprietary and different delicate data.” The company additionally cited analysis estimating that over 95% of staff with a noncompete have already got an NDA.

In response to the FTC’s announcement in regards to the new rule, noncompete clauses are “a widespread and sometimes exploitative follow imposing contractual circumstances that forestall staff from taking a brand new job or beginning a brand new enterprise.” Noncompetes typically power staff to both keep in a job they wish to depart or bear different important harms and prices, corresponding to being compelled to change to a lower-paying discipline, being compelled to relocate, being compelled to depart the workforce altogether, or being compelled to defend in opposition to costly litigation, in accordance with the company.

The FTC estimated that the ultimate rule banning noncompetes will result in new enterprise formation rising by 2.7% per 12 months, leading to greater than 8,500 extra new companies created annually. The company additionally stated it expects the rule to lead to greater earnings for staff, with estimated earnings rising for the typical employee by a further $524 per 12 months, and to decrease well being care prices by as much as $194 billion over the subsequent decade.